Results tagged “e911” from IP Communications and Technology

The VoIP E911 Problem - Solution Needed

| | Comments (4)

The Calgary Herald printed an article today commenting on the events that may have contributed to the death of a Calgary toddler. The article calls for regulators to mandate that VoIP providers have direct connections to 911 services. I agree.

As I have pointed out many times here previously, having 911 calls redirected to call centre has the potential of compromising the efficacy of the response. This is especially true when one considers that the person accepting the call almost certainly does not have the experience and training of a 911 operator.

The article points out that Canadian VoIP service providers opposed regulations that would have forced them to have direct connections to 911 call centres. I’m not convinced that’s entirely correct. If memory serves me (someone please correct me if I’m wrong), 911 centres themselves were opposed to direct connections from VoIP providers that could not guarantee that the provided address of the 911 caller was accurate.

Also, while I agree that VoIP based 911 calls should go directly to a 911 dispatch centre, it may not have made any difference in this case. Direct connection or not, the address in the database was wrong. Perhaps a 911 operator would have handled the situation better, perhaps not.

The fact is that with nomadic VoIP services, there is no fool proof way (that I know of) of ensuring that the location information associated with a 911 call will always be correct. I’ve given this subject a lot of thought over the years because I have always been troubled by the potential consequences. There are ways of addressing the problem, at least partly, but none of them are perfect or for that matter, practical.

What follows are various methods of associating a caller with a location:

Physical Connection

The telephony device is bound to a physical location. That’s the situation with a POTS line; the regular telephone service from your telephone company. The telephone is connected to a pair of wires which the telephone company can accurately associate with an address and the address never changes. In some cases a VoIP provider can use the same method but only if they control the entire infrastructure associated with the service which is the case with most cable companies.

Heartbeat

A VoIP provider can monitor the end device and detect a possible change in location. If the device goes out of service and then comes back into service with a different IP address, then it may indicate that the device has been moved. The key word is “may” since there are many situations where this could occur even if the device had not been moved. Still, the service provider could configure the service so that under this circumstance, the telephony user must confirm their address before the service is restored. There are many problems with this approach including the scenario where a caller connects a previously disconnected device and attempts to make a 911 call. Insisting that the caller first confirm the address before the telephony service is restored is not sensible in this circumstance!

Global Positioning Systems

Imbed GPS receivers in the telephony devices. Besides the fact that other components would be required to associate the GPS coordinates with physical addresses this approach is not practical for at least two reasons. The first is the cost associated with the GPS receivers. One can argue that cost should not be a factor when it comes to public safety but the fact remains that VoIP services will not exist if the economics don’t make sense. The second problem with this approach is that GPS receivers simply don’t work very well indoors. In fact in many situations they will be completely non functional.

Conclusion

The death of this child is tragic. The fact that a shortcoming of VoIP service may have played a role is also very troubling. It’s not the first event of its kind and sadly, it likely won’t be the last. However, the answer is not to shut down VoIP service providers - although I suspect the Telcos would be in favour of that option!

I’m sure a practical solution will eventually emerge. In the meantime if you are VoIP customer ensure that the address information on file with your provider is accurate. Do it now!

Note:

The 911 challenges discussed above relate to nomadic and residential VoIP or Internet Telephony services. When it comes to IP Telephony services for business, all of the E911 concerns can, and are routinely addressed satisfactorily.


StumbleUpon ToolbarStumble It! Add to Technorati Favorites

VoIP 911 Call May Have Been Factor in Child’s Death

| | Comments (0)

The Calgary Herald is reporting that a toddler has died, and that delays in the response to a 911 call (initially made using a VoIP service) may have been a contributing factor in the child’s death. The Herald is reporting that 40 minutes passed from the time the original call was placed until emergency crews arrived. A 911 call was later placed from a neighbour’s home and emergency crews arrived within six minutes of that call.

My thoughts and condolences go out to the child’s family. What a tragic and sad event!

I will attempt to follow the story as investigators work to discover what may have gone wrong in the process. In the meantime I will not speculate on the circumstances surrounding this tragedy but I would like to make a few comments on residential VoIP based services in general.

What follows in an excerpt from an article I wrote previously on the risks associated with residential VoIP services:

Emergencies

Yes, it’s true that most VoIP providers have E911 capabilities. However, in many instances, unlike your POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) service, your call does not terminate directly in the E911 PSAP. Instead, it is directed to a call centre first, which in my view, could potentially compromise the efficacy of the response. In addition, as others have pointed out, unless your ATA has, or is plugged into, a backup power supply, your VoIP service will be non-functional in a power outage. Even, with ATA backup power, a power interruption might bring down the network through which your VoIP service is delivered. Sure, most cable companies do have UPS to protect their trunk and distribution amplifiers but the capacity may be very limited which means that an extended and widespread outage will almost certainly result in your VoIP service going down. In addition, the reliability of the backup power is dependent on diligent maintenance, which is a non-trivial and expensive challenge. My Bell Canada phone service, I am confident, would continue to work even if a power outage lasted for weeks.

In addition to the potential risks in the above excerpt, with many Internet Telephony Services, it is essential that the customer completes an address form so that the correct relationship between the assigned telephone number and the customer’s address is on record at the service provider. It should also be pointed out that with many free Internet Telephony services, that there is no mechanism for associating the origin of a 911 call with an address.

Since writing the article on the risks of residential VoIP services, I have discontinued my POTS line. However, I have done so with a full understanding of the risks.

In my view, residential VoIP providers do not provide sufficient information to consumers regarding the risks associated with depending on a VoIP service as a primary line. In fact, many of the VoIP providers promote the service in a way that would lead consumers to believe that when it comes to service reliability and E911, that their services is equivalent to POTS, which they are not.

Whether you are currently a VoIP subscriber or are considering discontinuing your POTS line and replacing it with a VoIP service, I urge you to read my article on the potential risks before you make your decision

If you need help to assess the risks, please leave a comment here and I will do my best to provide you with factual information.

 

StumbleUpon ToolbarStumble It! Add to Technorati Favorites

Residential VoIP - Understand the Risks, Then Decide

| | Comments (1)
I stumbled across a conversation initiated by a post that Om Malik (best of luck with your recovery Om) wrote in his blog more than a year ago entitled PSTN versus VoIP. With respect to residential VoIP service, not much has changed since the original post.

I added the following to the many comments:

I have been using VoIP, in one form or another, for residential phone service for more than 8 years. I currently have 3 voice VoIP lines and 1 Fax VoIP line.

However, I still have my good old POTS service from Bell and I don’t intend to give it up for the foreseeable future. Here’s why:

QoS

Unless the service provider owns the network path end-to-end, they are unable to guarantee voice quality. The service is at the mercy of the conditions of the network between the end-device and their network. Despite this, in most cases it works great. But, if there are congestion or reliability issues anywhere along the path, you and the service provider may be completely powerless with respect to rectifying the issue. This happened to me a few years ago when my service provider began experiencing network congestion. My VoIP service became unusable due to excessive delay and jitter. Luckily I moved, and for the past two years the voice quality of my VoIP service has been great. But that could change at any time. Obviously the cable companies have an advantage here but that advantage is restricted to the subscribers that are on-net.

Trust

I am very confident that Bell Canada will still be in business a year from now. I’m also very comfortable with their ability to maintain consistent quality. In a year, my VoIP provider might be bankrupt. In fact, as I have stated previously, I’m convinced that a standalone best-effort VoIP service is not a sustainable business model. Vonage must change their business model or, I’m convinced, they will not survive. While the quality of my VoIP service has been, for the most part acceptable, I have experienced outages and messaging issues that are related to the VoIP provider’s core infrastructure. I lack confidence in their operations and their ability to scale; especially if financial pressures results in them sacrificing investment in operations in favour of marketing for example.

Emergencies

Yes, it’s true that most VoIP providers have E911 capabilities. However, in many instances, unlike your POTS service, your call does not terminate directly in the E911 PSAP. Instead, it is directed to a call centre first, which in my view, could potentially compromise the efficacy of the response. In addition, as others have pointed out, unless your ATA has, or is plugged into, a backup power supply, your VoIP service will be non-functional in a power outage. Even, with ATA backup power, a power interruption might bring down the network through which your VoIP service is delivered. Sure, most cable companies do have UPS to protect their trunk and distribution amplifiers but the capacity may be very limited which means that an extended and widespread outage will almost certainly result in your VoIP service going down. In addition, the reliability of the backup power is dependent on diligent maintenance, which is a non-trivial and expensive challenge. My Bell Canada phone service, I am confident, would continue to work even if a power outage lasted for weeks.

Conclusion

I am not bashing VoIP. I am passionate about the industry and the many advances that have been, and will continue to be enabled by VoIP. I use VoIP services because I get great features and services that are not available through any other source. For residential voice services, I am aware of the potential VoIP pitfalls and based on my assessment of the risks, I choose to keep my POTS service.

So choosing VoIP or not, exclusively or not, should be based on knowledge of the facts and the risks.

Rick McCharles
VoIP Consultant, Toronto, Canada

StumbleUpon ToolbarStumble It! Add to Technorati Favorites

Peel Police Issue Advisory on 911 and VoIP

| | Comments (0)
The Peel Regional Police have issued a public advisory related to 911 & VoIP. The advisory echoes the comments I have previously made on this issue. I applaud them for taking the initiative to inform the public with accurate information on this important issue.

Link here.

As always I make the distinction between best-effort delivery VoIP services and Enterprise-Class IP Telephony. The latter can effectively address all of the 911 issues.

Rick McCharles
www.ric.ca

Full Text Follows:

February 6, 2007

Peel, ON 06 Feb 07 – Peel Regional Police, along with the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board are warning consumers who are considering buying or already purchased Internet-based telephone service to be aware of certain technical 9-1-1 limitations.

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) is a telephone service that connects calls to the internet as a means of communicating with other phones. The VoIP system is becoming increasingly popular because it is cheaper to rent and make long distance calls. The traditional 9-1-1 system, which is based on the use of landlines, provides that the emergency call will go to the correct 9-1-1 Centre and provide automatic address and telephone information. This is not guaranteed with the VoIP system.

Here are some of the limitations of VoIP services during an emergency:

  • VoIP has two types of telephone services: Nomadic (no fixed address) and Non-nomadic (having a fixed address linked to the telephone and the internet connection).
  • Nomadic phones and some fixed phones (depending on your provider) calling 9-1-1 must connect first to a third party call centre and that call centre must then re-direct it to the appropriate 9-1-1 centre.
  • The VoIP service provider’s call centre may be sending your emergency call to a non-emergency telephone number, which will result in delays and could have serious consequences.
  • If the caller is unable to speak or the call is disconnected, the call centre may not be able to determine the address of the emergency.
  • If your service provides enhanced 9-1-1, delivering location information to the 9-1-1 centre, it will be the information that you registered with your VoIP service provider. The routing to the appropriate 9-1-1 centre is also based on the information you provided as part of your registration process. Please ensure it is correct and update it when your locations change.
  • When using some VoIP services automatic location information is not provided to the 9-1-1 centre.
  • 9-1-1 Service is not available if your Internet connection is down.
  • 9-1-1 Service is not available if there is a power failure.

Consumers are strongly urged to consider these facts and ask the following questions before subscribing to a VoIP service:

Will I be able to dial 9-1-1?

Do you provide enhanced 9-1-1? (phone number and address)

Will my 9-1-1 calls go directly to the local 9-1-1 centre?

Will my address information be presented to the 9-1-1 centre?

Public Safety is a priority to both the Peel Regional Police and the Ontario 9-1-1 Advisory Board. Consumers should contact their VoIP telephone service providers to clarify the options and restrictions of their products pertaining to access to 9-1-1. VoIP service providers are required to advise consumers of the limitation of their service in regards to accessing 9-1-1. StumbleUpon ToolbarStumble It! Add to Technorati Favorites

Residential VoIP Growth & Associated Risks

| | Comments (0)
predicts that the number of worldwide residential VoIP subscribers will grow from last year’s 38 million to over 267 million by 2012. According to ABI, most of the growth will be at the expense of the Telcos as cable and broadband providers aggressively leverage their high-speed data networks. Link to the article.

The numbers are impressive and, to me, somewhat worrisome. I’m convinced that many consumers are making a decision to abandon their analogue residential service without being fully informed of the potential risks including:

  • Security: Most VoIP services do not encrypt the signaling or the voice payload. I personally have been using such a service for several years and I’m not very concerned. But, at least I am aware of the potential risk and use my service accordingly.

  • Power Interruptions: Cable operators will typically provide an analogue adapter with battery backup and have some level of backup power within their infrastructure. Assuming that all the backup systems have been properly maintained (a big assumption), and that all of the automated systems function as planned, residential VoIP subscribers can expect the service to remain active for a few hours at best. For most other VoIP service provider subscribers, a power interruption affecting the subscribers’ homes will result in an immediate service failure.

  • 911: When it comes to automatically identifying the location of a 911 caller, rules vary from country to country. In Canada, (assuming the provider complies with regulations), a 911 caller may first be directed to a national call centre where an agent will confirm the location of the caller then route the call to the appropriate local emergency service. It is an additional step in the process with a potential for failure and it may increase response time. Additionally, in traditional analogue voice services, the 911 operator can prevent the caller from disconnecting the call; not so with residential VoIP services. And as discussed in the next point, whether an intelligible conversation can take place with the 911 services personnel is dependent on the quality of the broadband connection.

  • Voice Quality: The quality of a residential VoIP service is dependant on the network connection delivering the service. If the service provider owns the broadband connection then it is possible to prioritize voice packets to ensure voice quality. Most cable operators’ VoIP services do in fact protect voice traffic by giving it priority over data. Most other VoIP service providers do not have this capability and therefore voice quality can be severely affected by network congestion. Current trends suggest that bandwidth intensive applications such as video streaming and peer-to-peer file sharing will contribute to bandwidth shortages and likely VoIP quality issues.

I have been involved with VoIP technology since 1998 and I have consistently commented on its beneficial and disruptive impact on the communications industry. However, I believe more must be done to inform consumers of the potential risks. Once the risks are understood, consumers can make an intelligent decision about whether or not they should discontinue their primary line (traditional) voice service.

Note: As I have previously, I make the distinction between consumer VoIP services and enterprise-class IP Telephony. In the latter, all of the risks mentioned in this post can be adequately addressed and the implementers will typically understand the risks and how to mitigate them.

Rick McCharles
www.ric.ca

StumbleUpon ToolbarStumble It! Add to Technorati Favorites

The VoIP E911 Myth Just Won't Die

| | Comments (0)
I read an article this morning in Network World entitled "10 things you need to know about VoIP". The article has some good tips.

It also has this statement that contributes to the ongoing myth that E911 doesn't work in IP Telephony:

"VoIP doesn’t allow for easy 911 calling because the voice server has no idea where the phone is, just its IP address."

If you know the IP address and that IP address is on your network, that may give you a pretty good clue as to where the phone is located! Also, IP phones have MAC addresses which, in a properly configured IP Telephony system and network can give you extremely accurate 911-caller location information.

Bottom line is that all the major enterprise-class IP Telephony manufacturers provide the functionality to accurately locate 911 callers, and its done routinely in enterprise class deployments. It is possible that someone in a Toronto office, could bring their IP Phone to Tokyo and make a 911 call from the new location; this would obviously cause a problem.

There are 3 ways to address the problem:

  1. Prevent the activation of an IP Telephone from an IP address that is not within your approved defined network boundary. This can be done with policy or it can be technically enforced.
  2. If an IP Phone registers with an IP address that is outside of your defined boundary, force the user to enter their location information.
  3. Use some common sense!

The context of the article was enterprise-class IP Telephony and that's an important distinction from consumer based VoIP services. But even with these, E911 can work just fine for non-nomadic users. My street address is registered with my Vonage service. If I call 911 from my Vonage phone, my location address will be relayed accurately. A greater concern for me in this case, is that the quality of my broadband connection may be too poor for an intelligible conversation with 911 services personnel. But that's the subject of another post.

Here's some pointers on how some of the IP Telephony manufacturers address E911.

Avaya's Approach (PDF)

Cisco's Solution

Nortel Works With Qovia

I'll keep doing what I can to dispel the silly notion that enterprises deploying IP Telephony are putting the effectiveness of emergency services at risk.

Rick McCharles
www.ric.ca
StumbleUpon ToolbarStumble It! Add to Technorati Favorites

The 911 VoIP Myth

| | Comments (0)
A very common concern that is raised about IP Telephony, is E911 services. There’s a widely held belief that 911 services will not work over VoIP. The fact is, that most business class IP Telephony systems from vendors such as Cisco, Avaya and Mitel have addressed most of the challenges associated with 911. In fact many 911 enhancements, relative to traditional TDM based systems, are made possible by IP based systems.

The most serious concern people have, is that it is not possible to reliably determine the location of the 911 caller. This is simply not the case. In fact, in many cases caller location information will be more accurate in IP Telephony systems since the databases that associate a telephone with a location are often updated by automated processes in contrast to many legacy systems that required a manual update. In addition, some IP Telephony systems are capable of providing more precise location information than traditional systems such as “2nd Floor, East Wing”.

IP Telephony systems can also provide 911 related features that are either not possible or rarely implemented in TDM based systems such as:

  • Automated database updates of phone location
  • More detailed location information
  • The ability to trigger other events when someone dials 911. Since, IP Telephony is based on software there’s virtually no limit to the type of events that can be triggered. The most popular is to alert someone of the 911 call such as a security desk for example.
  • Do I dial 9 for an external line, then 911 on this phone? Doesn’t matter, dial 9911 or 911 and the IP Telephony system can make the call.
  • Depending on the signaling protocol, an IP Telephony system can prevent a caller from disconnecting a call.
On an IP phone with an external speaker, the system can simply switch the phone to speakerphone mode allowing the operator to continue to communicate with the caller. On non-speaker phones, the system can keep the call to the emergency centre active and ring the caller’s phone as soon as they hang up.

Still, there is room for improvement and you should carefully examine the 911 capabilities of your vendor. And while many IP Telephony systems can track phone locations within specific predefined boundaries, there are limitations. That’s because it may be possible, depending on policy and system configurations, to move an IP Telephone to any location in the world. To date, there is no automated way to deal with this issue. While some contend that the solution is to embed GPS receivers in telephone devices, I’m convinced that this approach is not practical. Besides, even if it was possible to track a phone anywhere in the world, what action should a Toronto based IP Telephony system take if it detects that a 911 call has been dialed by one of its subscribers from a hotel room in Tokyo? I don’t expect that we’ll see a solution to this type of scenario in the foreseeable future.

One possible partial solution to handle the issue of the nomadic aspects of IP Telephony is to place the onus on the user. For example, if the IP Telephony system detects that a phone has gone out of service and appears with a different IP subnet address, it would indicate that the phone may have moved. The system could then force the user to inform the system of the new location information before it would allow outgoing calls. There are cons to this approach and it still doesn’t solve the Toronto to Tokyo scenario I previously described.

On the consumer front, the nomadic aspects are even more challenging since there’s no practical way of accurately determining the location of an IP address. The only method is to place the onus on the user to notify the service provider with the correct location information; which is the approach that Vonage has implemented.

Rick McCharles
http://www.ric.ca/

StumbleUpon ToolbarStumble It! Add to Technorati Favorites

Implications of VoIP Growth Projections

| | Comments (0)

According to Osterman Research, 45% of U.S. business and organizations will be using VoIP by the end of 2007. Jupiter Research reports that 12.1 million U.S. households will be using VoIP.

I’m a little skeptical of these forecasts but even if the actual numbers are only half of the projections there are serious implications.

Implications for Enterprise

If you’re responsible for your organization’s voice services and you haven’t given IP Telephony any thought, the time is now. At the very least, you should understand the drivers behind the technology shift and the potential implications to your business. Media hype aside, sooner or later, IP Telephony will be part of your voice communications and you should at least have a high level plan and timeframe on how you will make the transition. Often, a preliminary investigation will reveal surprising cost and competitive advantages to making the transition much sooner than you may have anticipated.

Implications for Regulators and Service Providers

The tremendous growth of residential VoIP services should instill a sense of urgency with regulators and service providers to address many of the technical issues that have not yet been adequately addressed:


  • E911 Services

  • Routing the emergency call to the correct location

  • Preventing a caller from disconnecting the call

  • Ability of emergency personnel to call back

  • Quality of Service

  • Having the 911 routing issue solved won’t help if the non-QoS enabled network connection is so congested that the voice is unintelligible

  • Emergency issues aside, customers will demand consistent voice quality

  • Power Protection

  • Unlike PBX systems that usually have very limited battery backup protection, residential POTS services will continue to function for days and longer. Today’s residential VoIP services don’t even come close to replicating this level of availability.


Rick McCharles
www.ric.ca
StumbleUpon ToolbarStumble It! Add to Technorati Favorites
About Me

Tags

My Links