VoIP: Perceived Risks & Best Practices
Dial VoIP For Vulnerability
A couple of comments on the article:
- The author immediately makes the association between VoIP and “sending voice calls over the Internet”. This association is done all the time but Enterprise IP Telephony and transporting voice over the Internet are two completely different things. And, an Enterprise can enjoy the benefits of an IP Telephony system without ever sending a single call over the public Internet.
- Many of the security precautions mentioned in the article are just common sense and should already be part of a sound security policy.
- The incident at Merril Lynch would not have affected voice traffic if the data network was properly designed and configured.
- Separating voice traffic from data traffic with VLANs is a VoIP best practice. However, it’s only part of the answer since the two types of traffic will still meet on trunks and on PCs. Properly configured QoS is also required to ensure that data traffic never impedes voice traffic.
- The perception that 911 doesn’t work with IP Telephony is false. Are there VoIP services that don’t have adequate 911 services? Of course, but there are no technical barriers preventing an enterprise from implementing fully functional E911 services on their IP Telephony system and it’s routinely implemented today.
- The following quote from the article is just silly and plain wrong:
“According to Chris Rouland, CTO at security firm Internet Security Systems, it's as easy to intercept unencrypted VoIP calls as it is to use an iPod. By downloading software off the Internet, hackers can intercept calls "with a simple click", he says. In order to protect caller IDs, phone addresses and account information, VoIP users need to encrypt SIP traffic.”
- Yes, free software is available to sniff and decode all voice traffic. However, in a properly configured network within an environment that has a solid security policy, the potential sniffer will never get an opportunity to even see the traffic. In a properly configured switched infrastructure, users A’s voice traffic can not be detected from user B’s data jack because it’s simply not there. Is it possible to send A’s traffic down B’s data connection? Yes, but the potential eavesdropper would need access to the closet in which the switch resides or would require administrative access to the switch. You did lock the closet and restrict access to authorized personnel only didn’t you?
Rick McCharles
http://www.ric.ca/
Stumble It!
3 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: VoIP: Perceived Risks & Best Practices.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.ric.ca/mt/mt-tb.cgi/17
I'm amazed at the viral charateristics of the propagation of stories related to VoIP security risks. I don't really understand why that's the case. Perhaps it's due to the emotion of fear and the basic instinct of defending oneself against... Read More
Yesterday, Verizon announced that it will be opening up its network to non-Verizon supplied devices. I believe the decision is of great significance and marks the beginning of a shift towards openness that will ultimately spread to all major wireless... Read More
Moments ago, Industry Minister Jim Prentice announced that a portion of the spectrum up for auction next spring will be reserved for industry newcomers.The move, along with other factors such as the impact of the iPhone and yesterday's announcement by... Read More

